Here are competitors or alternatives to Contenive and other similar Content Management System software. You need to consider some important factors when choosing a tool like Contenive for your business: the main features of each solution, ease of use of user interface, pricing or value for money for instance. Each software has its pros and cons so it's up to you to choose the best alternative to Contenive that meets the needs of your small business. To help you compare each app and choose the right solution, we have put together a list of the best competitors of Contenive. Discover sofware like Slack, GitHub, Weblium or Azure DevOps.
From Content Management System tools, we have selected the best alternatives to Contenive based on reviews for each solution and similarities with Contenive. Of course, each solution has its benefits and drawbacks, and its own features but, whether you are a small business, a startup or a large enterprise, you will find the right choice that empowers your projects.
Description
Easily collaborate and organize your team's work with Slack; share information and organize your projects.
Slack compared to Contenive
Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Slack: 99 vs 95
Contenive is better at customer service than Slack: 5.0 vs 4.5
Contenive is easy to use compared to Slack: 5.0 vs 4.5
Contenive pricing plans are more competitive than Slack: 4.8 vs 4.6
Slack has more functions than Contenive: 78 vs 29
Slack: Pros & Cons
Best features
Slack pricing
Free
Enterprise Grid
Contact salesPro
$7 / user / monthBusiness+
$13 / user / monthPopular
Description
The online solution GitHub allows you to store the source code of your IT project. You can thus keep the history of your modifications and share your code with your collaborators, your partners or your customers.
GitHub compared to Contenive
Contenive has better positive reviews compared to GitHub: 99 vs 98
Contenive is better at customer service than GitHub: 5.0 vs 4.4
Contenive is more user friendly than GitHub: 5.0 vs 4.4
Contenive is better at value for money than GitHub: 4.8 vs 4.6
GitHub has more features than Contenive: 42 vs 29
GitHub: Pros & Cons
Best features
GitHub pricing
Free
Team
$4 / user / monthEnterprise
$21 / user / monthDescription
Easily create your own website with all the features you need at your fingertips. No experts needed.
Weblium compared to Contenive
Weblium has better positive reviews compared to Contenive: 100 vs 99
Weblium has more features than Contenive: 57 vs 29
Weblium: Pros & Cons
Best features
Weblium pricing
Free
Pro
$8 / monthStudio
$250Description
Azure DevOps brings value by providing a comprehensive platform for software development, collaboration, and deployment. It offers a range of tools and services to streamline the entire application lifecycle, from planning and coding to testing and deployment. With Azure DevOps, teams can work together effectively, automate workflows, track progress, and ensure high-quality software delivery.
Azure DevOps compared to Contenive
Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Azure DevOps: 99 vs 89
Contenive is better at customer service than Azure DevOps: 5.0 vs 4.2
Contenive is easier to use than Azure DevOps: 5.0 vs 4.2
Contenive is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Azure DevOps: 4.8 vs 4.4
Contenive is more versatile than Azure DevOps: 29 vs 9
Azure DevOps: Pros & Cons
Best features
Description
Kangaroo is a dynamic physics simulator for designers, allowing interactive exploration of physical behaviors and relationships. It offers tools for form-finding, optimization, and constraint solving, ideal for architects, engineers or designers. It's a plugin for Grasshopper, a graphical algorithm editor integrated with Rhino's 3-D modeling tools. Kangaroo allows real-time interaction with the simulation, providing instant feedback and control over the design process.
Kangaroo compared to Contenive
Contenive is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Kangaroo: 99 vs 96
Contenive is a better solution for customer support than Kangaroo: 5.0 vs 4.5
Contenive is better at ease to use than Kangaroo: 5.0 vs 4.5
Contenive is better at value for money than Kangaroo: 4.8 vs 4.4
Kangaroo is more versatile than Contenive: 123 vs 29
Kangaroo: Pros & Cons
Best features
Description
Contentful is a cloud-based content management system (CMS) that allows users to create, manage and distribute content across various digital channels. It provides developers with a flexible and scalable platform for building modern applications, while enabling non-technical team members to update content independently. Contentful supports a multi-language feature and integrates with various other platforms, making it a versatile tool for businesses.
Contentful compared to Contenive
Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Contentful: 99 vs 90
Contenive is better at customer service than Contentful: 5.0 vs 4.0
Contenive is easy to use compared to Contentful: 5.0 vs 4.0
Contenive pricing plans are more competitive than Contentful: 4.8 vs 4.3
Contentful has more functions than Contenive: 56 vs 29
Contentful: Pros & Cons
Best features
Description
DotCMS is an open-source, Java-based content management system (CMS) that allows users to build, deliver, and scale content-driven websites and applications. It offers features like multi-channel content delivery, personalization, and headless CMS capabilities. Its flexibility and scalability make it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
Dotcms compared to Contenive
Contenive has more positive reviews than Dotcms: 99 vs 85
Contenive is better at support than Dotcms: 5.0 vs 4.0
Contenive is more user friendly than Dotcms: 5.0 vs 3.5
Contenive is better at value for money than Dotcms: 4.8 vs 4.2
Dotcms has more functions than Contenive: 53 vs 29
Dotcms: Pros & Cons
Best features
Description
XWiki is an open-source web-based wiki software platform. It's written in Java and uses a MySQL database. XWiki allows for the creation and management of data structures, storing data, making queries, and creating statistics. It also supports scripting in Velocity or Groovy. XWiki's main features include a WYSIWYG editor, rights management, workgroup spaces, full-text search, version control, and more. It's highly customizable and extendable through plugins or scripting.
Xwiki compared to Contenive
Xwiki has better positive reviews than Contenive: 100 vs 99
Contenive is easier to set up than Xwiki: 5.0 vs 4.5
Contenive is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Xwiki: 4.8 vs 4.7
Xwiki is more versatile than Contenive: 63 vs 29
Xwiki: Pros & Cons
Best features