8 Best Alternatives to Contenive in May 2024

Alternatives & Competitors to Contenive

  1. 1. Slack
  2. 2. GitHub
  3. 3. Weblium
  4. 4. Azure DevOps
  5. 5. Kangaroo
  6. 6. Contentful
  7. 7. Dotcms
  8. 8. Xwiki
View more

Here are competitors or alternatives to Contenive and other similar Content Management System software. You need to consider some important factors when choosing a tool like Contenive for your business: the main features of each solution, ease of use of user interface, pricing or value for money for instance. Each software has its pros and cons so it's up to you to choose the best alternative to Contenive that meets the needs of your small business. To help you compare each app and choose the right solution, we have put together a list of the best competitors of Contenive. Discover sofware like Slack, GitHub, Weblium or Azure DevOps.

List of Alternatives to Contenive

From Content Management System tools, we have selected the best alternatives to Contenive based on reviews for each solution and similarities with Contenive. Of course, each solution has its benefits and drawbacks, and its own features but, whether you are a small business, a startup or a large enterprise, you will find the right choice that empowers your projects.

logo slack

Description

Easily collaborate and organize your team's work with Slack; share information and organize your projects.

Slack compared to Contenive

Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Slack: 99 vs 95

Contenive is better at customer service than Slack: 5.0 vs 4.5

Contenive is easy to use compared to Slack: 5.0 vs 4.5

Contenive pricing plans are more competitive than Slack: 4.8 vs 4.6

Slack has more functions than Contenive: 78 vs 29

Slack: Pros & Cons

Accessible anywhere: This software allows employees to connect from many different devices
Customized channels: The tool offers the ability to create public, private, shared or multi-space chat channels
Real-time collaboration: The Slack communication solution is perfect for increasing responsiveness
Limited storage: The storage capacity of files is limited
Read notifications: It is impossible to know if your correspondent has read a sent message
Very limited free plan: The trial price plan has limited functionality

Best features

  • - Channels

  • - Direct messaging

  • - File sharing

  • - Integrations

  • - Search and archiving

  • - Notifications and alerts

  • - Threads

  • - Video and voice calls

Slack pricing

Free

Enterprise Grid

Contact sales

Pro

$7 / user / month

Business+

$13 / user / month

Popular

25% off new plan purchases (Save $9,000)
Get deal
logo github

Description

The online solution GitHub allows you to store the source code of your IT project. You can thus keep the history of your modifications and share your code with your collaborators, your partners or your customers.

GitHub compared to Contenive

Contenive has better positive reviews compared to GitHub: 99 vs 98

Contenive is better at customer service than GitHub: 5.0 vs 4.4

Contenive is more user friendly than GitHub: 5.0 vs 4.4

Contenive is better at value for money than GitHub: 4.8 vs 4.6

GitHub has more features than Contenive: 42 vs 29

GitHub: Pros & Cons

Versatile tool: The platform allows for code publishing, teamwork, and version control
Collaborative design: Code can be shared and improved through feedback
Code security: GitHub is useful for saving source code in the cloud
Cost of the solution: Some features are not free. The prices can be high depending on the number of collaborators
Learning curve: It takes a while to master the subtleties of this versioning tool
Graphical interface: The ergonomics and user-friendliness of GitHub are insufficient

Best features

  • - Store and secure your code

  • - Access development environments

  • - Secure your software applications

  • - Collaborate with ease

  • - Automate your workflows

  • - Visualize your project

  • - Write higher quality code

  • - Leverage the power of AI

GitHub pricing

Free

Team

$4 / user / month

Enterprise

$21 / user / month
20 seats on the Enterprise plan free for 1 year (Save $7,560)
Get deal
logo weblium

Description

Easily create your own website with all the features you need at your fingertips. No experts needed.

Weblium compared to Contenive

Weblium has better positive reviews compared to Contenive: 100 vs 99

Weblium has more features than Contenive: 57 vs 29

Weblium: Pros & Cons

Mobile-friendly design: Weblium ensures that your website will look great on any device to reach a wider audience
Time-saving templates: Weblium offers pre-designed templates so you can quickly build a professional website
Drag-and-drop editor: With Weblium's easy-to-use editor, you can customize your website without any coding skills
Limited customization options: Weblium may have restrictions on customizing the website layout and design
Dependency on templates: The platform's reliance on templates may limit the uniqueness and originality of the website
Potential lack of scalability: Weblium may not provide enough flexibility for businesses to scale and adapt as they grow

Best features

  • - CRM

  • - Pop-Ups

  • - Online store

  • - Drag & drop website builder

  • - AI design supervisor

  • - Mobile optimization

  • - Live chat

  • - SEO

Weblium pricing

Free

Pro

$8 / month

Studio

$250
20% off annual Pro plan (Save $19)
Get deal
logo azure devops

Description

Azure DevOps brings value by providing a comprehensive platform for software development, collaboration, and deployment. It offers a range of tools and services to streamline the entire application lifecycle, from planning and coding to testing and deployment. With Azure DevOps, teams can work together effectively, automate workflows, track progress, and ensure high-quality software delivery.

Azure DevOps compared to Contenive

Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Azure DevOps: 99 vs 89

Contenive is better at customer service than Azure DevOps: 5.0 vs 4.2

Contenive is easier to use than Azure DevOps: 5.0 vs 4.2

Contenive is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Azure DevOps: 4.8 vs 4.4

Contenive is more versatile than Azure DevOps: 29 vs 9

Azure DevOps: Pros & Cons

Streamline project management: Azure DevOps offers a comprehensive set of tools for planning, tracking, and collaborating on projects
Continuous integration and delivery: Automate the development process, ensuring efficient and reliable software delivery
Integrated ecosystem: Azure DevOps seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft tools and services for a cohesive development experience
Limited integration options: Azure DevOps may not seamlessly integrate with all the tools and systems you use
Steep learning curve: It can take some time for young entrepreneurs to fully understand and utilize all the features of Azure DevOps
Costly for small businesses: The pricing structure of Azure DevOps may not be affordable for startups with limited budgets

Best features

  • - Version control

  • - Project management

  • - Continuous Integration (CI)

  • - Continuous Delivery (CD)

  • - Testing tools

  • - Monitoring and logging

  • - Security and compliance

  • - Collaboration and reporting

There is no deal for this product
View product details
kangaroo logo

Description

Kangaroo is a dynamic physics simulator for designers, allowing interactive exploration of physical behaviors and relationships. It offers tools for form-finding, optimization, and constraint solving, ideal for architects, engineers or designers. It's a plugin for Grasshopper, a graphical algorithm editor integrated with Rhino's 3-D modeling tools. Kangaroo allows real-time interaction with the simulation, providing instant feedback and control over the design process.

Kangaroo compared to Contenive

Contenive is a better solution based on percentage of positive reviews than Kangaroo: 99 vs 96

Contenive is a better solution for customer support than Kangaroo: 5.0 vs 4.5

Contenive is better at ease to use than Kangaroo: 5.0 vs 4.5

Contenive is better at value for money than Kangaroo: 4.8 vs 4.4

Kangaroo is more versatile than Contenive: 123 vs 29

Kangaroo: Pros & Cons

Physical Simulation Capabilities: Kangaroo allows users to simulate and explore physical behaviors and forces in their designs, such as gravity, tension, compression, and elasticity
Real-time Interactive Simulations: The software offers both real-time interactive simulations and deeper iterative methods, providing flexibility in how users approach their design process
User-friendly Interface: Kangaroo features a user-friendly interface with intuitive commands, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced designers.
Limited Documentation: Kangaroo lacks comprehensive documentation which makes it difficult for new users to understand its functionalities
Complex User Interface: The software has a complex user interface which can be confusing and not user-friendly, especially for beginners
Lack of Customer Support: Kangaroo does not offer strong customer support, which can leave users struggling to resolve issues on their own.

Best features

  • - Physics Simulation Capability

  • - Integration with Rhino 3D

  • - Interactive real-time simulations

  • - User-friendly interface

  • - Application in Design Optimization

There is no deal for this product
View product details
Secret.

Go Premium

Get access to all our 362+ Premium deals for only $149/year.

contentful logo

Description

Contentful is a cloud-based content management system (CMS) that allows users to create, manage and distribute content across various digital channels. It provides developers with a flexible and scalable platform for building modern applications, while enabling non-technical team members to update content independently. Contentful supports a multi-language feature and integrates with various other platforms, making it a versatile tool for businesses.

Contentful compared to Contenive

Contenive has better positive reviews compared to Contentful: 99 vs 90

Contenive is better at customer service than Contentful: 5.0 vs 4.0

Contenive is easy to use compared to Contentful: 5.0 vs 4.0

Contenive pricing plans are more competitive than Contentful: 4.8 vs 4.3

Contentful has more functions than Contenive: 56 vs 29

Contentful: Pros & Cons

Scalability: Contentful is a headless CMS that scales as your needs grow, making it a great choice for businesses of all sizes
API-First Approach: Contentful uses an API-first approach, which means it can integrate seamlessly with other tools and platforms, providing a more flexible and efficient workflow
High Customizability: Unlike traditional CMSs, Contentful allows you to define your own content model, giving you more control and flexibility over your content.
High cost: Contentful's pricing can be quite expensive, especially for smaller businesses or startups
Limited customization: While Contentful offers a range of features, there are limitations to how much you can customize the platform to meet specific needs
Learning curve: The platform can be complex and difficult to understand for beginners or non-technical users.

Best features

  • - API-centric

  • - Supports multiple content types

  • - Robust APIs

  • - Headless architecture

  • - User roles & permissions

There is no deal for this product
View product details
dotcms logo

Description

DotCMS is an open-source, Java-based content management system (CMS) that allows users to build, deliver, and scale content-driven websites and applications. It offers features like multi-channel content delivery, personalization, and headless CMS capabilities. Its flexibility and scalability make it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.

Dotcms compared to Contenive

Contenive has more positive reviews than Dotcms: 99 vs 85

Contenive is better at support than Dotcms: 5.0 vs 4.0

Contenive is more user friendly than Dotcms: 5.0 vs 3.5

Contenive is better at value for money than Dotcms: 4.8 vs 4.2

Dotcms has more functions than Contenive: 53 vs 29

Dotcms: Pros & Cons

Ease of Use: DotCMS has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for non-technical users to create and manage content
Scalability: DotCMS can easily scale to handle high traffic loads and large amounts of content, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises
Flexibility: DotCMS supports multiple sites, languages, and channels, allowing businesses to tailor their content strategy to their specific needs.
Complex setup process: dotCMS can be challenging to set up, especially for beginners or those without technical knowledge
Limited customer support: while dotCMS offers support, it can sometimes be difficult to get timely help or solutions to specific problems
High cost: compared to other content management systems, dotCMS can be quite expensive, especially for small businesses or individual users.

Best features

  • - Open-Source

  • - Enterprise-Grade CMS

  • - Multi-Language and Multi-Site Support

  • - Integration and Custom Development

  • - Scalable and Secure

There is no deal for this product
View product details
xwiki logo

Description

XWiki is an open-source web-based wiki software platform. It's written in Java and uses a MySQL database. XWiki allows for the creation and management of data structures, storing data, making queries, and creating statistics. It also supports scripting in Velocity or Groovy. XWiki's main features include a WYSIWYG editor, rights management, workgroup spaces, full-text search, version control, and more. It's highly customizable and extendable through plugins or scripting.

Xwiki compared to Contenive

Xwiki has better positive reviews than Contenive: 100 vs 99

Contenive is easier to set up than Xwiki: 5.0 vs 4.5

Contenive is more suitable for small businesses thanks to its good value for money than Xwiki: 4.8 vs 4.7

Xwiki is more versatile than Contenive: 63 vs 29

Xwiki: Pros & Cons

Ease of Use: XWiki's interface is user-friendly, making it easy for users to create and edit pages
Extensive Customization: XWiki allows users to customize their wiki pages with various applications and extensions
Advanced Permissions Management: XWiki provides a detailed permissions management system, allowing administrators to control who can view or edit specific pages.
Complex setup: XWiki's installation process can be quite complex and time-consuming, especially for non-technical users
Limited customization: While XWiki does offer some customization options, they are not as extensive or user-friendly as some other platforms
Learning curve: Due to its extensive features and functionalities, new users may find XWiki difficult to navigate and understand initially.

Best features

  • - Open Source

  • - Collaborative Platform

  • - Extensible

  • - Wiki Syntax

  • - Advanced Permissions

There is no deal for this product
View product details