Pros from reviewers
-
Streamlined feedback collection and version tracking: QuickReviewer significantly improves the review process by consolidating all feedback and tracking versions in one place, making it easier and more efficient than using email and Google Drive
-
User-friendly interface: The software is easy to understand and use, with a setup time of just a day and a learning curve of about 2 hours for an entire team. It also features a Google Drive style interface, making it familiar and intuitive for new users
-
Excellent support team: QuickReviewer provides quick responses and excellent service, ensuring that any issues or queries are addressed promptly and effectively
-
Affordable and flexible: QuickReviewer is a cost-effective solution, offering a good price/performance ratio. It is also flexible, allowing for easy adaptation to different workflows and needs
-
Enhanced collaboration with workspaces feature: The workspaces feature allows for the creation of separate spaces for different teams or projects, improving collaboration and organization within design teams.
Cons from reviewers
-
Lack of Adobe CC integration: Although QuickReviewer has plans to integrate Adobe CC in the future, the current lack of this feature can be a disadvantage for users who heavily rely on Adobe CC for their work
-
Absence of historical comments: When a new version of a document is uploaded, all previous comments are lost. This can be frustrating for users who want to refer back to previous feedback
-
Limited file compatibility: QuickReviewer only accepts .pdf documents, which can be a hindrance for users who work with a variety of file formats
-
Visibility issues with comments and annotations: The comment icon is small and hard to see, and comments in the column can be difficult to read due to contrast and brightness issues. Other annotations like lines, boxes, and arrows are not prominent enough and are too small
-
Lack of certain features: Users have expressed a desire for features such as the ability to disable downloads until approval is received, the option to leave voice memos on video timestamps, and the ability to draw and add shapes to facilitate commenting. The absence of these features can limit the software's functionality for some users.
Main features
Starting Price
Free Plan
Collaborative Reviewing
Version Management
Annotations and Comments
Support for various file formats
Data Security
Starting Price
N/A
Free Plan
No
Collaborative Reviewing
Version Management
Annotations and Comments
Support for various file formats
Data Security
What is Quickreviewer?
How Quickreviewer compare to similar software?
Product
Quickreviewer
4.5
Quickreviewer reviews
Price
N/A
Free plan
No
Main features
Pros
Cons
Alternatives
Deal
No available deal at the moment
Who is Quickreviewer best for according to our reviewers?
Design Teams: QuickReviewer is beneficial for design teams due to its workspace feature that enhances collaboration. It streamlines feedback collection and version tracking, making it more efficient than using email and Google Drive
Digital Marketers: QuickReviewer serves as a Digital Asset Management (DAM) tool, making it ideal for digital marketers who collaborate with various vendors and formats. It integrates with Adobe apps and Dropbox, simplifying the proofing process
Creative Team Managers: QuickReviewer is suitable for creative team managers who handle numerous files for review. It provides a clear view of each file's status and consolidates all comments from various channels into one place, improving clarity and reducing rework
Video Editors: QuickReviewer is useful for video editors due to its video review and editing features. It simplifies commenting and stamping, although it currently lacks features such as voice memos on video timestamps and the ability to disable downloads until approval is received
Graphic Designers: QuickReviewer is ideal for graphic designers as it consolidates all design feedback onto one platform. It simplifies the process of setting up and sharing a proof for review, and its intuitive interface makes adding comments easy.
Quickreviewer reviews
4.5
Quickreviewer rating
4.5
Ease of use
5.0
Customer service
4.7
Value for money
4.4
Likelihood to recommend
4.3
Features
6 Quickreviewer reviews
-
Terry
Improvements Needed: Document Type Compatibility, Technical Support, Speed, and Interface Clarity
I find it frustrating having to wait for documents to be available for review, often taking until the next day to access them. While QuickReviewer can review documents, images, websites, and videos, it lacks clarity in its use of website links and plug-ins. It crashes when loading videos, only accepts .pdf documents, and offers only one way to comment on documents. The comment icon is so tiny it's barely visible, and comments in the column are hard to see due to contrast and brightness issues. Other annotations like lines, boxes, and arrows are not prominent enough and are too small. I chose QuickReviewer thinking it would be a one-stop solution for reviewing, and I switched to it believing it would work.
May 12, 2024
-
Jett
QuickReviewer's Annotation Tools: A Graphic Designer's Best Friend
As a graphic designer, I find the annotation tools in QuickReviewer incredibly helpful for providing clear and precise feedback to my team
May 7, 2024
-
Timothy W
Using this software for online creative proofing.
I have been using Quickreviewer for a year now. It has greatly simplified my graphic design and online proofing tasks. It has been a blessing in managing client reviews, leading to an excellent client experience, saving time on projects, and allowing more time for business development.
April 30, 2024
-
Juan S
Discovered while seeking Dropbox PDF review alternatives
I find QuickReviewer to be fast and user-friendly, and I plan to use it more frequently. I appreciate its speed, ease of use, and the quick understanding it provides for anyone transitioning from Dropbox. I also enjoy its dark mode and the fact that the developers seem to genuinely care about the product. However, I miss the ability to view all historical comments once a new version of a document is uploaded. I've been in touch with the development team about this issue. I chose QuickReviewer primarily for its price/performance ratio, as I work in the boardgame publishing industry and come from a country with limited funds, making cost a significant factor in our decision. I switched to QuickReviewer from Dropbox due to bugs and unbearable slowness with the latter.
April 23, 2024
-
Ethan
Top Site for Reviewing Video Content with TimeStamp Comments!
I can easily leave timestamps and even free draw on the video or use arrows to explain where on the screen I want something. I can @ping/tag other users within a timestamped comment. I love that I can send files to get timestamp comments from people outside of my business, like a sponsor who can review a video before it is published, without needing an account to leave comments. I can mark a video as: Uploaded, In Review, Approved, Pending, or Rejected. It's cheaper than its competitors. In fact, they allow me to pay and add unlimited people to upload to my Team folder, unlike competitors who charge per team member.
April 16, 2024
